Sources and notes (18)
- Ponemon Institute, Lessons Learned from the 2026 Global Cost of Insider Risks, and the 2026 Ponemon/DTEX study. Underlying year 2025. DTEX sponsors the study. Annual organizational costs and credential-theft incident costs are different measures. The DTEX study announcement reports a 20% increase over two years; Ponemon reports that only 13% of incidents were contained in less than 30 days.
- DTEX, The Lethal Trifecta of AI Agents, citing the 2026 Ponemon Cost of Insider Risks Report: 18% of organizations had fully integrated AI governance into insider risk programs. DTEX sponsors the research.
- Verizon, 2026 Data Breach Investigations Report, pages 12 and 20. The 62% figure describes the non-intentional human element in breaches analyzed.
- CNN, British engineering giant Arup revealed as $25 million deepfake scam victim, May 2024, syndicated by KRDO. Arup confirmed the use of fake voices and images. This is a public fraud example, not a ClearForce customer result.
- U.S. Department of Justice, Chapman sentencing release, July 24, 2025. The scheme involved 68 stolen identities, 309 U.S. businesses, and more than $17.1 million in proceeds. The release does not establish that each business performed pre-hire screening.
- KnowBe4, How a North Korean Fake IT Worker Tried to Infiltrate Us, July 23, 2024, and company FAQ. First-party account; the company reported no illegal access or lost, compromised, or exfiltrated data.
- U.S. Department of Justice, U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Massachusetts, November 12, 2024; NBC News on the Department of the Air Force investigation, December 2023.
- United States v. Zheng, No. 23-6070 (2d Cir. 2024).
- ClearForce anonymized customer deployment metrics and consent capture rates across regulated-industry deployments. First-party data.
- Federal Bureau of Investigation, San Francisco Field Office, "FBI Warns of Increasing Threat of Cyber Criminals Utilizing Artificial Intelligence," May 8, 2024.
- U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries, 2024. 470 workers died in workplace homicides in 2024. This does not imply all incidents involved employee perpetrators. BLS Table 2 gives the comparison: 458 workplace homicides in 2023 and 470 in 2024.
- Allied Universal, 2025 World Security Report U.S. findings, September 24, 2025. Vendor-commissioned survey of 620 U.S. chief security officers; 46% reported an increased threat of violence toward executives over the prior two years.
- Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, Section 5(a)(1), General Duty Clause.
- California Labor Code section 6401.9 (SB 553); California Division of Occupational Safety and Health, Workplace Violence Prevention in General Industry.
- U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, 2026 National Veteran Suicide Prevention Annual Report, released September 30, 2026. Data year 2024.
- U.S. Department of Defense, Annual Report on Suicide in the Military, Calendar Year 2024, as reported by Military Times, March 31, 2026.
- ClearForce, Critical Infrastructure Customer Case Study, page 3. Customer-reported booking and court-record alert timeline.
- ClearForce, Preventing Insider Threat Helped Global Market Leader Halt Data Transgressions and Theft from Trusted Employees, pages 2–3. Criminal alerts prompted the customer's investigation into internal data theft.
Booking Monitoring
Research behind the story
- Bureau of Justice Statistics, Jail Inmates in 2024 – Statistical Tables, final report, September 2026, displays 16–17. U.S. local jails reported 7.9 million admissions and an average stay of 31 days before release for July 2023–June 2024. These national measures describe jail activity; the average stay is not an employee-specific estimate or a monitoring delivery time.
- National Safety Council, Injury Facts: Assault at Work, reporting BLS 2023–2024 data. The 77,780 cases combine days away from work, job restriction, or transfer across both years. Of these, 54,230 involved days away from work; this is an overlapping subset, not an additional case total. Workplace assaults include incidents involving people outside the workforce and do not identify who was arrested or establish product-preventable events.
- National Safety Council, Injury Facts: Glossary; checked November 2, 2026. Defines the distinction between cases involving days away from work and the broader measure also including job restriction or transfer. The two featured assault measures overlap; neither is an employee criminal-activity estimate.
- ClearForce, Informed Monitoring with Transparency, Consistency, Compliance. Further reading on the company’s approach to monitoring, privacy, and employee support.
These sources explain the context for ongoing visibility. They do not measure ClearForce coverage, product performance, or the proportion of incidents preventable through monitoring.
Court Record+ Monitoring
Research behind the story
- The Pew Charitable Trusts, State Courts Play a Key Role in American Life, April 2025, pages 3 and 5 and methodology appendix. National estimates based on 2022 Court Statistics Project data: approximately 38 million traffic filings and 11 million public-safety filings. Pew’s traffic category includes noncriminal violations and criminal traffic matters; its public-safety category includes criminal cases, protection orders, and juvenile matters. These broad court categories are not a list of records included in Court Records+.
- Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts, U.S. District Courts — Judicial Business 2025, Criminal Filings section. Fiscal year ended September 30, 2025: a median 6.9 months from filing of proceedings to termination for criminal defendants. These are federal defendant measures, not state-court timelines, employee-only counts, or ClearForce delivery times.
- U.S. Courts, Criminal Cases. Background on federal charges, pleas, trials, and sentencing. Cited for the distinction between stages and outcomes, not as a description of product coverage.
- SEARCH, Survey of State Criminal History Information Systems, 2022, September 2024, printed page 3 (PDF page 17), Table 1 and its notes; checked November 2, 2026. Forty-eight states and the District of Columbia reported an average of 73% of arrests in their state databases with final case dispositions recorded. This is an average of jurisdiction percentages, not a nationally weighted percentage of all arrests; states use differing cycle- or charge-matching methods. Missing disposition information does not mean that a case remains pending. This BJS-funded third-party report describes repository records as of December 31, 2022, not ClearForce completeness or coverage.
Research describes the court environment and the value of case context. It does not measure ClearForce coverage, customer results, or how frequently employees encounter these matters. Product availability depends on participating sources and the selected monitoring scope.
Financial Monitoring
Research behind the story
- Federal Reserve Board, Economic Well-Being of U.S. Households in 2025: Economic Hardships, May 2026. In the October 2025 survey, 59% of U.S. adults reported at least one major unexpected expense during the preceding 12 months. Separately, 28% struggled with bills in the preceding month, including missed bills or difficulty paying. Separately, 16% did not pay all bills in full in the preceding month; for credit cards, this means paying less than the minimum payment, not simply carrying a balance. The 16% and 28% measures overlap and must not be added together. These are population survey measures, not employee-only findings or credit-report detection rates.
- Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Quarterly Report on Household Debt and Credit, Q2 2026; checked November 2, 2026. At the end of June 2026, 4.7% of outstanding household debt was in some stage of delinquency. This measures balances across debt types, not the percentage of borrowers, employees, or accounts. It is not a ClearForce alert rate or a measure of misconduct.
- Federal Trade Commission, Using Consumer Reports: What Employers Need to Know. Federal employment consumer-report requirements include disclosure, written permission, and applicable adverse-action procedures. State restrictions may also apply. This resource supports the permitted-use FAQ; it is not a statement that every employee or jurisdiction is eligible.
Research provides context for changing financial circumstances and reported payment difficulties. It does not predict an individual's conduct or measure ClearForce customer outcomes. Product descriptions reflect available credit-reported information and the configured program.
Dual Employment Monitoring
Research behind the story
- U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Multiple jobholders by selected characteristics, Table 36, 2025 annual estimates. An estimated 8.8 million people held multiple jobs, representing 5.4% of employed people age 16 and over; 417,000 had full-time primary and secondary jobs. Full time means at least 35 hours per week. The 2025 estimates average 11 months because October data were not collected; BLS cautions against direct comparison with other years. These measures include legitimate multiple jobholding and do not establish undisclosed work, simultaneous working hours, or policy violations.
- SHRM, SHRM Releases 2025 Benchmarking Reports: How Does Your Organization Compare?, October 15, 2025; checked November 2, 2026. Reports a $5,475 average cost per nonexecutive hire. This replaces the historical $4,683 benchmark used in the original materials. It measures recruiting investment, not losses from dual employment or savings from monitoring.
- ClearForce, Dual Employment Monitoring, accessed October 30, 2026. Product context for monthly or quarterly monitoring, employment updates, report access, and the business concerns associated with conflicting employment commitments. The published overview cites more than 60,000 active members of Overemployed.com without a measurement date or underlying membership methodology. This is an attributed community figure, not an independently verified current count or an estimate of employees with conflicting jobs. Update timing depends on the configured service and underlying reporting; not every outside job is visible.
- Federal Trade Commission, Using Consumer Reports: What Employers Need to Know. Supports the FAQ on disclosure, written authorization, continuing-report scope, and applicable employment decision requirements. Product access does not replace the employer's compliance obligations.
- Tom Miller, ClearForce, How to Prevent and Address Dual Employment Through Improved Policies and Continual Monitoring, undated white paper, printed pages 1–2. Covers policy, disclosure, duty-of-loyalty provisions, conflicts of interest, employment restrictions, and monitoring. The page updates the paper's older remote-work and hiring-cost figures using BLS 2025 estimates (source 6) and SHRM 2025 benchmarking (source 2). The remaining original figures are retained from ClearForce's materials. Original studies for the paper's 50% same-industry, 29% earning $100K+, and 12% post-pandemic increase figures were not located in the October 30, 2026 source review. Their survey populations and comparison periods remain unconfirmed. These three percentages should not be treated as current representative workforce estimates. Employment-policy and agreement provisions require assessment for the applicable jurisdiction and circumstances.
- U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, People at work by telework status, Table 60, 2025 annual estimates; checked November 2, 2026. Of people age 16 and over who worked during the survey reference week, 22.4% teleworked or worked at home for pay for some or all hours. This is not the share working fully remotely, holding multiple jobs, or violating outside-employment policies. Estimates average 11 months because October 2025 data were not collected and are not strictly comparable with other annual averages.
- U.S. Office of Personnel Management, FY 2021 Status of Telework in the Federal Government, December 2022, Eligibility and Participation, PDF page 11. Reports 50% of federal employees eligible for telework in FY2021, the same percentage as FY2020. This supports the historical eligibility percentage, but telework eligibility does not mean fully remote work. The report states 47% participated in telework in FY2021; it does not substantiate the separate 10–20% remote-work range in ClearForce's original graphic. An original source, date, and denominator for that range were not located in the October 30, 2026 review. Neither figure should be read as a current federal-workforce estimate.
The research describes multiple jobholding, community interest, and hiring investment. It does not identify how many employees violate outside-employment policies or measure ClearForce coverage or customer results.
Internal Employee Incident Monitoring
Research behind the story
- Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Occupational Fraud 2026: A Report to the Nations — key findings, May 12, 2026. Of the 2,402 investigated occupational fraud cases across 143 countries, 43% were detected following a tip; employees supplied more than half of those tips. The employee share refers to tips, not all cases. This is a study of investigated fraud cases, not a measure of fraud prevalence or of ClearForce customer outcomes.
- NAVEX, 2026 Whistleblowing & Incident Management Benchmark Report, pp. 12 and 71–72. The 2025 benchmark for the interval from an alleged incident to its report was eight days, calculated as the median of participating organizations’ median intervals. The overall database included 4,052 organizations with at least ten reports in 2025 and 2.37 million reports. This is a reporting-program benchmark, not a ClearForce response-time measure or evidence that a portal eliminates reporting delays.
- ClearForce, Internal Incidents and Capabilities Introduction, internal incident portal description. Product materials describe self-reported, internal, third-party, and anonymous incidents across configurable activities. Reporting examples on this page illustrate potential uses; program categories, access, and reporting options depend on configuration.
Research explains the importance of receiving employee information. A submission is an account to assess, and the reporting channel supports the organization’s response rather than guaranteeing an outcome.
Sex Offender Registry Monitoring
Registry context and further reading
- U.S. Department of Justice, About the Dru Sjodin National Sex Offender Public Website, accessed October 30, 2026. NSOPW links public state, territorial, and tribal registry information through a national search resource. Individual jurisdictions maintain the underlying information, and the available search details vary. This describes the public registry environment; it is not a statement of ClearForce's contracted coverage, integration method, or delivery timing.
- U.S. Department of Justice, NSOPW Frequently Asked Questions, accessed October 30, 2026. Explains jurisdiction-specific publication practices, records across multiple jurisdictions, and the role of originating registries in providing detail and handling corrections. Registry information and use restrictions should be considered in the context of the relevant jurisdiction. No nationwide employment prohibition or automatic employment outcome is implied.
Registry context helps explain how to interpret available information. It does not establish an individual's current behavior, measure ClearForce coverage, or demonstrate a reduction in workplace incidents.
Global Watchlist Monitoring
Understanding different source types
- U.S. Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control, FAQ 5: Assessing OFAC Name Matches, updated September 9, 2026; accessed October 30, 2026. Explains the importance of identifying the relevant list and distinguishing OFAC sanctions from lists maintained by other authorities. Different lists and programs have different implications. Cited for source interpretation, not as proof of ClearForce's current list coverage or as a complete sanctions-compliance procedure.
- INTERPOL, About Red Notices, accessed October 30, 2026. A Red Notice is a request to law enforcement concerning a wanted person; it is not itself an international arrest warrant. Notices may concern a person sought for prosecution or to serve a sentence. This example illustrates why the notice must be read in context.
- World Bank, Listing of Ineligible Firms and Individuals, accessed October 30, 2026. The debarment table concerns eligibility for World Bank-financed contracts for the periods indicated. Its defined scope illustrates why an exclusion should not be described as a universal prohibition.
- World Bank Group, Sanctions System Annual Report FY25, printed page 15 (Sanctions section); checked November 2, 2026. In FY2025 the Bank debarred or otherwise sanctioned 32 firms and individuals, and the Bank Group recognized 20 cross-debarments from other multilateral development banks. These are separate administrative activity measures; they should not be summed as a global count of unique sanctioned parties. They illustrate changes in eligibility for Bank-financed activity, not the list inventory or alert volume of ClearForce's service.
These official sources explain the meaning of public list categories. They are not a confirmed inventory of ClearForce's current service coverage, update timing, or available alert fields. Discuss the sources included in your program with ClearForce.
Public Credit Monitoring
Judgment context and public-record activity
- The Pew Charitable Trusts, How Too Many State Policies Fail Americans Sued for Debt, December 19, 2024, updated August 25, 2025; checked November 2, 2026. Pew reports that 60–70% of debt cases ended in default judgment in jurisdictions where it had conducted technical-assistance work. This is a selected-jurisdiction range, not a national rate. Default follows nonparticipation and does not establish the underlying explanation or individual misconduct.
- Internal Revenue Service, Internal Revenue Service Data Book, 2025, Table 4-1, printed page 61 (PDF page 69); accessed October 30, 2026. Reports 214,099 notices of federal tax lien filed during October 1, 2024–September 30, 2025, displayed as 214K+. This is a count of notices across taxpayer types, not unique individuals, employees, all lien categories, or ClearForce alerts.
- The Pew Charitable Trusts, Debt Collection Lawsuits Surge to Pre-Pandemic Highs, September 2, 2025; accessed October 30, 2026. Cites Pew’s estimate of up to 4.7 million U.S. debt collection lawsuits filed in 2022. Separately, the article reports that in 35 states and Washington, D.C., debt judgments can remain enforceable for at least a decade. That is the legal landscape described in the 2025 research, not a universal duration or current legal advice. The filing count describes lawsuits, not judgments entered or unique people, and is not a 2026 estimate. Used to explain the broader civil-debt landscape; Public Credit is not general monitoring of every civil lawsuit.
The studies describe different populations and time periods. They provide judgment and public-record context, not estimates of ClearForce coverage, product effectiveness, or the likelihood that financial hardship leads to misconduct.
Identity Fraud and Risk Reports
Identity misuse and workforce investigations
- Federal Trade Commission, Protecting Older Consumers 2025–2026, October 19, 2026, printed page 19 (PDF page 22); checked November 2, 2026. The report's all-consumer context states that Consumer Sentinel received nearly 1.4 million identity-theft reports during calendar year 2025, directly and through data contributors. These are self-reported consumer complaints across contexts and ages, not confirmed cases, unique victims, fraudulent job applicants, or workforce incidents. This broader reporting universe is not directly comparable with the former IdentityTheft.gov-only figure. The FTC did not take consumer reports during the October 1–November 13, 2025 funding lapse.
- U.S. Department of Justice, Sentencing in the Chapman remote-IT-worker fraud case, July 24, 2025; accessed October 30, 2026. Reports 309 U.S. businesses defrauded, 68 U.S. victims’ identities stolen, and more than $17 million in illicit revenue. All three featured figures describe the same scheme, not annual national totals. The case illustrates workforce exposure; it does not establish that ClearForce would have detected or prevented it.
- FBI Internet Crime Complaint Center, North Korean IT Workers Expanding Use of Facilitators, Broadening Recruitment, October 13, 2026; accessed October 30, 2026. Recommends layered controls and assessment of combined indicators throughout the employment lifecycle. No single signal reliably identifies a North Korean IT worker. Cited for investigative context, not a claim that this product determines nationality or affiliation.
- Federal Reserve Board, Federal Reserve System white paper on synthetic identity payments fraud, July 9, 2019; accessed October 30, 2026. Describes synthetic identities as combinations of real and fictional information. Used for the concept definition, not current prevalence or employment-screening performance.
External research explains the threat and review context. Available assessment outputs depend on your selected service and inputs; the research is not a product accuracy or prevention claim.
Comprehensive Reports
Research behind the investigative context
- U.S. Department of Justice, Paragon Systems Agrees to Pay $52M to Resolve™ False Claims Act Allegations Concerning Fraudulently Obtained Small Business Contracts and Kickbacks, November 12, 2024; checked November 2, 2026. A $52 million civil settlement addressed alleged use of controlled small businesses and figurehead owners. The government alleged over 300 payments totaling more than $11 million to former executives, concealed as consulting fees paid through shell companies. The settlement resolved allegations without a determination of liability. These figures concern one matter and include investigative information beyond public-record searches; they do not establish ClearForce access to bank records, detection capability, or customer outcomes.
External research explains why investigative follow-up matters. It does not establish that a particular public record reveals misconduct or that a Comprehensive Search Report would detect a studied scheme.
Verification of Employment Reports
Employment context behind the review
- U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Multiple jobholders by selected characteristics, Table 36, 2025 estimates; accessed October 30, 2026. Reports 8,800,000 multiple jobholders (5.4% of employed people age 16 and over), including 5,042,000 with a full-time primary and part-time secondary job and 417,000 with two full-time jobs. The page rounds 5,042,000 to 5.04 million. Full time means at least 35 hours per week. Estimates average 11 months because October data were not collected, and are not strictly comparable with other annual averages. These figures do not establish undisclosed work, overlapping schedules, or policy violations.
Labor-market research provides context for different employment arrangements. It does not measure ClearForce report coverage or establish the circumstances of any individual employment record.
Social Media Reports
Research behind the public-activity context
- Pew Research Center, Americans’ Use of Social Media in 2026, October 19, 2026; accessed October 31, 2026. Survey of 5,511 U.S. adults conducted January 30–June 18, 2026. Among U.S. adults, 84% say they ever use YouTube, 70% Facebook, and 51% Instagram. These overlapping platform-use measures are not daily-use rates, estimates of workplace misconduct, or claims about accessible public content or ClearForce report coverage.
- ADL, Online Hate and Harassment: The American Experience 2024, adult results, printed pages 27 and 37; checked November 2, 2026. February–March 2024 survey about the prior 12 months. Among all adult respondents (unweighted n=2,479), 22% reported severe harassment, 10% physical threats, and 8% stalking. Among adults who experienced harassment (unweighted n=819), 29% reported sleep/concentration difficulties or anxiety, and 19% took steps to reduce personal-safety risks. These overlapping self-reports include nonpublic activity. They are not workforce prevalence, evidence about any individual, or product detection rates.
- ClearForce, Informed Monitoring with Transparency, Consistency, Compliance, and Resolve™ Platform; accessed October 31, 2026. Supports the broader ClearForce perspective on employee support, privacy, role-based review, case documentation, and coordination across functions. Initial screening and optional ongoing monitoring serve different review needs. Monitoring runs at the configured cadence; broader platform descriptions should not be read as a promise of instantaneous detection for this service.
External research explains the reach of social media. Report contents depend on the authorized inquiry, configured settings, platform access, and available public information.
Deep Open Internet Reports
Research and investigative context
- Pew Research Center, When Online Content Disappears, May 17, 2024; checked November 2, 2026. Of sampled 2013 webpages, 38% were inaccessible in October 2023. The measure describes a specific page cohort and study interval, not all current webpages. It supports source references and research limitations, not claims that unavailable material can be recovered.
- ClearForce, Investigative Data Services; accessed October 31, 2026. Describes online research using known identifiers, development of associated leads, and optional visual relationship analysis. The specific source mix, availability, outputs, and timing for an engagement should be agreed with ClearForce.
- U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, SEC Obtains Final Judgments Against Defendants in Fraudulent ICO Scheme, May 19, 2022; checked November 2, 2026. Reports that Centra Tech's offering raised over $32 million. The enforcement matter involved fabricated executive biographies and false partnership claims; the release records final judgments on consent and related criminal guilty pleas. This is one historical case, not an annual fraud total or proof a public-source search would have detected the scheme.
- U.S. Department of Justice, Co-Founder of Cryptocurrency Company Who Defrauded ICO Investors Sentenced to Prison, December 15, 2020; checked November 2, 2026. Describes internet-distributed materials promoting a fictitious CEO and another fictitious executive, summarized as two, along with nonexistent institutional partnerships. DOJ's digital-fund valuations and the SEC's offering figure describe different measures; no growth or recovery comparison is made. The case illustrates the need to examine public claims in context, not ClearForce investigative access or performance.
Research provides context for careful source assessment. Each engagement follows its agreed purpose and scope; online references and associations require interpretation in context.
Workforce Risk Assessments
Research and assessment context
- Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Occupational Fraud 2026: A Report to the Nations, pages 40–41 and 45; checked November 2, 2026. In investigated occupational fraud cases, organizations with formal fraud risk assessments had median losses of $80,000 versus $150,000 without them (47% lower), and median scheme durations of 10 versus 15 months (33% shorter). Separately, 80% of victim organizations modified anti-fraud controls after the fraud. These observational associations do not establish causation. Formal fraud risk assessments in this study are not equivalent to ClearForce's Workforce Risk Assessment, which examines defined workforce information to support program planning.
- ClearForce, People Risk Analytics: Stand Alone Workforce Risk Assessment Service; accessed October 31, 2026. Describes one-time or periodic historical assessments for defined populations, configurable lookback periods, anonymized reporting options, and findings delivered through analysis, reports, and dashboards.
- ClearForce, Workforce Risk Assessment, two-page guide; accessed October 31, 2026. Explains the post-hire visibility gap and the use of workforce analysis to inform risk management strategy. Population, sources, reporting detail, timing, and pricing are agreed for the engagement.
Assessment findings support planning and contextual review. They do not establish an individual’s future behavior or replace the organization’s process for evaluating a specific matter.
Due Diligence Reports
Research and relationship context
- U.S. Department of Justice, Commodities Trading Company Will Pay Over $661M to Resolve™ Foreign Bribery Case, March 1, 2024; checked November 2, 2026. Gunvor admitted that between 2012 and 2020 it and co-conspirators paid over $97 million to intermediaries knowing some funds would be used to bribe Ecuadorian officials. The criminal penalty and forfeiture totaled over $661 million, subject to credits for specified foreign resolutions. Intermediary fees are not all described as bribe payments; the two monetary figures must not be added as a loss total. One historical case illustrates third-party exposure, not partner misconduct prevalence or ClearForce outcomes.
- Transparency International, Corruption Perceptions Index 2025, published February 10, 2026; accessed October 31, 2026. More than two-thirds of the 182 countries and territories scored below 50 on the 0–100 scale. The index measures perceived public-sector corruption; it does not assess an individual’s conduct, all forms of corruption, or the suitability of a particular business relationship.
Research informs the rationale for contextual review. The scope, findings, and limitations of a due diligence engagement should be considered separately from population-level or case-study statistics.
Program Analytics
Product and research context
- ClearForce, People Risk Analytics; accessed November 1, 2026. Describes a Resolve™-connected reporting application for alert statistics, trends, categories, roles, locations, investigation outcomes, and program status, with reporting packages. Specific views and delivery requirements should be confirmed for the selected service.
- U.S. Government Accountability Office, Personnel Vetting: Leadership Attention Needed to Prioritize System Development and Achieve Reforms, GAO-26-108838, February 24, 2026; checked November 2, 2026. Citing Performance Accountability Council quarterly reporting, GAO reports approximately 30,000 continuous-vetting alerts requiring review per quarter in FY2023 and over 100,000 in Q3 FY2025, alongside increased enrollment. These are federal program alert counts, not unique people, confirmed incidents, or ClearForce results. The changing enrolled population limits interpretation of the comparison as a risk trend.
- ClearForce, Capabilities Introduction, Risk Analytics section, page 5; accessed November 1, 2026. Describes the reporting module and distinguishes it from scoped Workforce Risk Assessments and AI Risk Modeling.
Management examples illustrate how to interpret reporting. They are not promises of particular custom dashboards, automated actions, or individual predictions.
Veteran Outreach
Product and research context
- ClearForce, AI Risk Modeling; checked November 4, 2026. Describes managed data preparation, model development, a population workshop, and scoring reports, findings, and visualizations. Identifies veteran outreach as an application. Inputs and deliverables should be established for the engagement.
- U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, 2025 National Veteran Suicide Prevention Annual Report, Part 2: Report Findings, pages 4 and 12; checked November 4, 2026. Reports 6,398 veteran suicide deaths in 2023, with 61% among Other Veterans, defined as those without the specified VHA care in the year of death or preceding year. This does not establish absence of all health care or support. These figures describe population need, not product outcomes.
- ClearForce, Suicide Prevention; checked November 4, 2026. Describes research-informed modeling, analytics, and outreach prioritization for veteran service organizations rather than direct service to individual veterans. Product configuration and evaluation should be discussed for the proposed program.
Outreach prioritization supports human review and contact planning. It is not a clinical diagnosis or a guarantee of an individual outcome.
Social Media Reports
Research behind the public-activity context
External research explains the reach of social media. Report contents depend on the authorized inquiry, configured settings, platform access, and available public information.